Saturday, 30 January 2010

The Pseudo Science Of Global Warming

“He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future.”—George Orwell, 1984.

I define Global Warming thus: An ingenious method devised by the crooks on Wall Street, the US government, the globalists and the Illuminati to rob mankind yet one more time through the Kyoto Protocol, which has now become international law, and which all industrial nations except the USA have ratified.

Prof. Riaz-ul-Haq, I cannot believe you are a global warmist, but then what is believable about this website except that it bans, as a matter of policy, those who speak the truth.

Please refrain from spinning the yarn of numbers and lying with statistics like you did with your recent blog ‘Carbon Credits For Clean Energy in Pakistan’ (http://www.chowk.com/ilogs/76112/48173).

First they called it ‘Global Warming’, and showed us manipulated data and out of context pictures of melting glaciers and desperate polar bears. Second, when the fraud was found out, they changed the name to ‘Climate Change’!

Mankind can never change whatever change God ordains. Drastic changes have taken place in the past on Earth that had nothing to do with human activity. Warming has been noticed on the moons of some planets too; does that mean humans are responsible? Must we believe lying men in white coats and bureaucrats?

Global warming is a massive fraud that is being forced by the industrialized world and its high priests of technology and pseudo-sciences (like Al Gore and his minions) down the throats of developing nations.

You, Prof. Riaz-ul-Haq, ought to know better. You are condoning this gospel of untruth aimed at extorting money from countries through carbon taxation. Obviously, the West wants an end to oil producers’ dominance, and it wants us to pay them for developing technologies it will very kindly sell to the poor at exorbitant prices; this is the only way the West can bulldoze China and other Asian emerging giants.

The West has successfully made the children of the world feel terribly guilty about global warming—as if the very act of exhaling carbon dioxide and passing gases out of our hindquarters is a cardinal sin worth taxing and trading on Wall Street.

All the financial woes we face today come directly from the money wheeler-dealers. The world has had enough of the shylocks of Wall Street. Nicely disguised as prosperity, these crooked bankers have always inflicted economic ruin upon mankind. We must give the devils due credit—if you would understand the pun—for the Credit Crunch.

Prof. Riaz-ul-Haq, has your adopted country ever thought about these issues, considering that it is the largest manufacturer of arms and the chief exporter of terrorism disguised as democracy? It has 700 military bases worldwide and supports forty repressive regimes. Bankrupt America needs to mind its own business, clean its own backyard and generally behave itself. It is on the verge of being wiped out economically; whether it will vanish physically off the face of Earth depends on God’s Will.

Comparing total greenhouse gas emissions in 2009 to 1992 levels, the U.S. emissions were up by 18.09%, with irregular fluctuations from one year to another but a general trend to increase. The U.S. per-capita CO2 emissions for 2007 were 19.94 Metric Tonnes per carefree American. Its share of worldwide CO2 emissions for the same year comes to 20.08%.

The U.S. contains 4% of the world's population but produces about 25% of all carbon dioxide emissions. Are you all happy Americans willing to tax yourself for this crime? By comparison, Britain emits 3%—about the same as India that has fifteen times as many people. Unbelievable, is this not?

So how does this new business work? Take for example, Poland, which is likely to release less greenhouse gas than permitted by the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. It can therefore sell the difference to polluters who exceed their ceiling. Japan has made similar agreements with the Czech Republic, Ukraine and Hungary. What a wonderful way to make tons of money through forced taxation—as unblessed as usury—from nothing at all!

George Warmonger Bush said about the Kyoto Protocol: “This is the American position because it's right for America. We will not do anything that harms our economy, because first things first are the people who live in America.”

The warm message from the USA is that ‘the U.S. corporations have the right to pollute the entire planet. The people and the environment don't matter.’

In his farewell address, Dwight D. Eisenhower gave this warning:

“Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard, there are now hundreds of new electronic computers. The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present—and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.

It is the task of statesmanship to mould, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system—ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.”

Thursday, 28 January 2010

Pakistani Passports, British Intelligence And Al-CIAda

It is indeed overwhelming how the British lost a number of Pakistani passports recently. Nobody questions the British how they achieved this feat.

Obtaining a two-year British multiple entry visa already costs nearly Rs 29,000, while a ten year multiple visa cots upwards of 70,000. Add to that the humility of filling endless documents, and photocopies on 100-gram A4 sheets of paper with information going back to the time when dinosaurs ruled the world. Then throw in the possibility of having one’s application rejected on flimsy grounds. For most people, the re-application process costs them fantastic sums, not to mention the colossal waste of time attempting to get an appointment for submitting the application.

Our busy-with-terrorists government could not care less how the British High Commission fleeces the citizens in a humiliating manner. The British claim that the lost documents may end up in the hands of Al-CIAda terrorists, enabling them to travel incognito and commit terror worldwide.

Who do they think we are to believe this intelligence manoeuvre that will ensure these passports are misused to give Muslims a bad name everywhere? A number of lost travel documents had multiple visas of various Western countries stamped on them; these ‘could be easily tampered with for illegal air travel and immigration’.

“If terrorists get hold of these passports, they can alter them with the help of human-trafficking mafia and move freely to various countries, especially the US and UK, to carry out terror activities,” the sources said.

Last month, it British High Commission lost around 100 Pakistani passports submitted for obtaining visas while it was shifting operations to Abu Dubai owing to security risks here. British authorities have so far failed to provide the exact number or a plausible reason for the loss of the passports, causing trouble for applicants. There were also several students amongst the applicants.

As we all know too well, the poor students will be—in some future date—rounded up and accused of planning to ensure the fall of the London Bridge or of imagining to set the parliament building on fire. Since every child can sing ‘London Bridge is falling down’, they may as well imprison them all for being part of an ancient conspiracy to bring the darned structure down through loud singing.

Our students face dire threats and I would advise parents to think twice before blindly sending the apples of their eyes abroad to waste hard-earned money on useless paper degrees. They want your visa fees, the college tuition fees and then your children too. For what, you may ask?—why, to make old England a paradise on Earth at our expense.

Rob Murphy, a British spokesman told the media, “There are exaggerated stories about them but the exact number of the lost passports is less than 100. We are investigating the matter, but I cannot say anything about the conclusion of the probe.”

To a question about terrorists being able to use them for illegal purposes, Murphy said the high commission had already informed the visa applicants to get new passports and re-apply for their visas.

What a wonderful way of making the citizens go around in circles to satisfy the British crown’s wishes!

Diplomatic sources said more than 100,000 visas are still lying with the UK Border Agency, which now entertains visa applications from Pakistan. Even Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani, in his meeting with British Foreign Secretary David Miliband earlier this month, expressed frustration over the delays and demanded relaxation in the visa policy for Pakistanis.

Has our Prime Minister ever had his visa application rejected: his passport stolen or lost by the British: ever stand in a queue behind fifty ordinary mortals or do what he expects millions of Pakistanis to do without asking a question and out of their own shrinking pockets? The answer to all of these questions is a big fat no.

Sherwani-clad men like Gilani dart about in their swift official cars without caring to see what is happening all around. The British take unfair advantage of the situation because they know millions of Pakistani families live divided lives in England and Pakistan and need to travel, no matter what the cost or the odds.

Tuesday, 26 January 2010

Picasso Trips Onto A Woman


At the peak of his career, Pablo probably—or rather definitely—did trip over many female fans; little did he know that after his death women would fall not for his brushstrokes but rather for his work’s obtrusiveness.

Some people are born clumsy or accident-prone but to fall over a rare and priceless work of art—a Picasso, for instance—is pure American genius.

An unidentified woman, after losing her balance, fell squarely over Picasso’s 100-years old masterpiece, called The Actor (1904), and caused a six-inch vertical slash in the lower right hand corner. This close encounter of the worst kind with art took place at New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art where the experts are now busy recovering from the shock of the damage.

Major collisions have taken place in this city.

First in 1945, when an Air Force B-25 bomber attempted to land into the famous Empire State Building; structural integrity of the building was NOT compromised, fourteen people died (three crewmen and eleven in the building) and one million US dollars' worth of damage was done.

Second, the Twin Towers being used as parallel runways in 2000 (2,750 deaths and complete destruction of the towers through successful implosions using carefully placed explosives).

And finally, the art-loving woman attempting to destroy cultural heritage.

The museum said ‘the slash did not affect the focal point of the composition and the repair—which will take place in the next few weeks—will be unobtrusive’.

Pablo Picasso created the painting, which depicts an acrobat posed against an abstracted backdrop, during his so-called Pink or Rose Period in the winter of 1904-5. The museum received the work as a donation in 1952. Officials say they expect the repair to be completed in time for a new exhibition—Picasso in the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

The woman in question was—hallelujah—attending an adult education class on Friday afternoon when she ran into the masterpiece measuring about 6 feet by 4 feet that hung on the wall of a second-floor gallery with other early Picassos. The museum did not reveal her identity and the accident caused no injury to her.

So far, they have not accused her—just as they have Dr Afia Siddiqui to make an example out of her in the land of the free and dumbstruck—of being ‘Lady Al-CIAda’, ‘The Grey Lady of Bagram’ or ‘The Most Dangerous Woman Of The World’.