Pricks and Boots

One Prick And It Is Done:

Court documents detailed how the man, 35, twice pricked his 33-year-old wife with a sewing needle laced with his infected blood. It is believed, the man wanted to give her the disease so she would start having sex with him again, New Zealand's Sunday Star-Times said.

The husband discovered he was HIV-positive, whereas his wife and children were not during health checks imposed on them when the family arrived in New Zealand in 2004.

The woman had said she wanted to maintain the relationship for the sake of the children but refused to have sex with him for fear of contracting the disease.

In the documents, the wife described how, in May 2008, she found a sting-like mark on her left thigh and two days later awoke to a stinging feeling in her leg.

She said, "I got up and I flicked the blankets. I looked at my husband and he was wide awake."

The wife asked him if he had pricked her and he said, 'No'. But she later found evidence of ‘blood sprinkles’ on their duvet, which she said her husband tried to hide from her.

During a routine check-up four months later, doctors revealed she was HIV-positive. The woman confronted her husband, who admitted dipping a needle in his blood and pricking her with it.

"All he said was he was sorry. He said, 'I used needles on you because I wanted you to be the same as me so that you can live with me and you won't leave me'," she said.

The husband has admitted wilfully infecting his wife with HIV-positive and faces up to 14 years in jail when he is sentenced at Auckland High Court next year.

*******

American Man Locks Sons In A Car Boot:

In the East, we love our children a great deal and would never do what an American man has done to his own children. He appeared in court in the U.S. state of Massachusetts and was accused of locking his two sons in the boot of his car while he visited a sailing shop.

Fall River police say that Michael Monahan left the children alone in the Pontiac Trans Am for several minutes. He told investigators the children, aged three and six, enjoyed ‘playing’ in there, court records show.

He has pleaded not guilty to two counts of assault and reckless endangerment of a child and was released on bail.

The children are now in the custody of their mother. The boys were spotted in the boot by a man who works in the sailing shop. He later called the police who tracked down the family.

Mr Monahan's lawyer told the Fall River District Court judge that the 35-year-old loved his children. Referring to his client, his lawyer said, "He's extremely distraught about this, your honour." Mr Monahan is due to reappear in court on 19 January.

Al-CIAda Blows Off Student's Jaw

The wonders that the mysterious Al-CIAda is able to perform, never ceases to amaze us. OBL is now suspected of sending his shalwar-qameez clad turbaned agents to Russian with great love.

What the authorities found in the northern Ukrainian city of Konotop was a 25-year man’s disfigured remains at his parent's home. The young man, who studied at Kiev Polytechnic Institute, was working at a computer late on Saturday when the alleged explosion happened.

"A loud pop was heard from the student's room," the Ukranews website said, citing an aide to the city's police chief. "When his relatives entered the room, they saw that the lower part of the young man's face had been blown off."

A forensic examination revealed that the chewing gum he chewed on was covered with an unidentified chemical substance, thought to be some type of explosive material. One could speculate that the material was the infamous plastic explosive called C4 being used so abundantly in Pakistan.

The student apparently had a bizarre habit of chewing gum after dipping it into citric acid, Russian news agency Ria Novosti said. Again, how the shalwar-qameez clad agents were able to brainwash the man into using the explosive material is not our concern; Al-CIAda is doing everything, including warming our globe.

Officers found both citric acid packets and a similar-looking unidentified substance, believed to be some kind of explosive material, on a table near the body. Investigators suspect that the student simply confused the packets and put gum covered with explosive material into his mouth. Forensic experts were to travel from Kiev to investigate the substance, as local authorities feared it might explode if transported.

Now, that kind of confusion confuses us all, does it not? I personally think OBL is somewhere in east Europe, possibly heading for its western part for Christmas.

A Merry Christmas to all.

Who Are Z-Men Who Control Zee Media?

I will say zees again: Chowq is controlled by Z-men (and Q-men) from planet Earth. But who are zay? Watch zee video.



Israel wants US to fight Iran with Twitter:

Never at a loss for words, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday told the USA to use Twitter and other social networking sites (Chowq?) to fight against the leadership of archenemy Iran.

“Iran prevents people from freely accessing the Internet,” a senior official quoted him telling parliament’s foreign affairs and defence committee.

Please bear in mind, Netanyahu and New York’s very own, Rudolph ‘Rudy’ W. Giuliani (‘911 exercise’ fame) were both in London when 7/7 (another planned exercise) just happened. Aww ma gawd!

“Using the Internet and Twitter against the Iranian regime is something extraordinary that the United States can do,” he said. Twitter was a favourite media for Iranian demonstrators who had joined opposition protests against the June re-election of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, claiming the vote was fraudulent.

On Monday, protesters gathered in Iran to mark the annual Students Day, with many chanting anti-Ahmadinejad slogans—naturally, they were paid to do just that. Ahead of Monday’s events, the Iranian authorities cut Internet connections and blocked access to several opposition websites—something that the West need not cry about because how Islamic Iran runs itself is Iran’s business.

To pay back the Iranian leadership in the same coin, Israel considers Iran its top enemy. Repeated statements by Ahmadinejad drive the points home that the ‘Jewish state is doomed to be wiped off the map’ and that ‘questioning the scale of the Holocaust’ is not abnormal behaviour.

Israel is widely considered the Middle East’s sole but undeclared nuclear power and it, along with the West suspects Iran of trying to develop atomic weapons under the guise of a civilian nuclear programme. Now, what about the Western atomic kittens selling the same WMD technology to its Christian allies? What is wrong of the Muslims wish to achieve a balance? Of course, what is wrong cannot be discussed here.

I think Yahweh gave Israel the right to obtain everything covertly, and since Allah has clearly spelled it out in:

Qur’an (3:28) LET NOT the believers take those who deny the truth for their allies in preference to the believers (Cf.19) - since he who does this cuts himself off from God in everything - unless it be to protect yourselves against them in this way. (Cf.20) But God warns you to beware of Him: for with God is all journeys' end.

Cf. 19: I.e., in cases where the interests of those "deniers of the truth" clash with the interests of believers (Manar 111, 278). Regarding the deeper implications of the term "allies" (awliya').

Cf. 20: Lit., "unless you fear from them something that is to be feared". Zamakhshari explains this phrase as meaning, "unless you have reason to fear that they might do something which ought to be guarded against" - obviously referring to situations in which "those who deny the truth" are more powerful than the Muslims, and are therefore in a position to damage the latter unless they become their "allies" in a political or moral sense.

In addition, in ...

(4:139) As for those who take the deniers of the truth for their allies in preference to the believers - do they hope to be honoured by them when, behold, all honour belongs to God [alone]? Cf.154

Cf.154: However, the term "allies" (awliya, sing. wali) does not indicate, in this context, merely political alliances. More than anything else, it obviously alludes to a "moral alliance" with the deniers of the truth: that is to say, to an adoption of their way of life in preference to the way of life of the believers, in the hope of being "honoured", or accepted as equals, by the former. Since an imitation of the way of life of confirmed unbelievers must obviously conflict with the moral principles demanded by true faith, it unavoidably leads to a gradual abandonment of those principles.